April 11, 20242 yr Author As far as the storage goes. The add-on it self does not store any information. It downloads a JSON string, parses the information and then submits it to HA entities via the Home Assistant's API and then deletes the file again when its done. Any entity created by the addon is temporary and will disappear by it self when you reboot. Once you post to an entity that that was removed after a reboot, it will simply come back again (With historical data) The addon does not use any templating. It simply uses the API to send data to HA. Its simple actually. Example of the battery voltage being sent to Home assistant. The $Variables are replaced with the config you provide in the add-on config screen and obviously the actual value of the entity $battery_voltage comes from sunsynk.net curl -s -k -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer $HA_LongLiveToken" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"attributes": {"device_class": "voltage", "state_class":"measurement", "unit_of_measurement": "V", "friendly_name": "Battery Voltage"}, "state": "'"$battery_voltage"'"}' $HTTP_Connect_Type://$Home_Assistant_IP:$Home_Assistant_PORT/api/states/sensor.solarsynk_"$inverter_serial"_battery_voltage $EntityLogOutput I will take a look to see what's possible with the configuration screen to select the type of system. The script for this is just a bash script and I'm not using any proper coding languages so when it comes to managing conditional statements and loops things become a little unconventional and super tedious and turns into a spaghetti mess 😀 The reason doing it this way is to make sure that there are ZERO dependencies. Linux environments tend to rely on library upon library. Fortunately a default docker has just enough to accomplish this add-on without having to install extra stuff. With regards to the unique ID. Although the "friendly name" is not unique the entity ID has the serial number of the inverter embedded See below $HTTP_Connect_Type://$Home_Assistant_IP:$Home_Assistant_PORT/api/states/sensor.solarsynk_"$inverter_serial"_battery_voltage It's probably a good idea to embed the site name into the friendly name. But once I do that everyone who is using this addon may have to remap their cards. But its possible that cards don't care about the friendly name as long as the entity ID remains the same. Edited April 11, 20242 yr by MartinViljoen
April 11, 20242 yr 14 hours ago, MartinViljoen said: Anyone care to vote ? ... What's you opinion ? I'd say that a single source repository is going to be easiest to maintain. However, it feels like there is maybe a different way of achieving this. Keep in mind I know nothing about HA development, but I'd be surprised if there isn't a way to have optional entities. Maybe determined by the config? Also, I'm not sure of the difference between Add-ons and Integrations. But Most other things of this type (Octopus, MyEnergi, Hive) are Integrations in HA, do they work differently? Maybe they have better control of the entities? Edited April 11, 20242 yr by jJasG
June 26, 20241 yr Hello Martin. Thanks so much for this great integration for SS inverters! I can now write settings to my 12kW 3p inverter from HA thanks to your response to my email and link to this page! 👏 This helps me a lot and I can now automate a few parameter settings to my needs. Thanks so much for your great work! 🤩 All the best from Norway. Jon B
July 15, 20241 yr Hi Martin. The Addon works so well. Thank you for your work and time on this. I have however just logged into my HA and I see none of my sensors are polling now. It was perfect for 2 or 3 days. See image attached. What could be the cause of this ?
July 17, 20241 yr Author I'm not sure. Perhaps the following may help you identify the issue. The entities where data is posted to are all static. If you reboot they will disappear (History remains though) until the add-on post to them again they will come back along with the history. So could it be that your HA server was rebooted ? and the addon was not set to start automatically and at the time you looked at the entities ? On your screenshot its also showing that your HA app is disconnecting , is everything stable with your network ?
July 18, 20241 yr Hi all, just one note. My auto-generated password for the Sunsynk portal contained a " which made it impossible for the addon to connect. Took me some time to figure that one out and actually read my password for once.
September 6, 20241 yr Hello, I have recently had my solar and inverter installed and am looking into how best to control the system with HA. Just moved to Octopus Flux, so would be interested in controlling charge/disharge rates and times - similar as can be done with the 'SmartDeyeDongle v4' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IktkBl3inTA&ab_channel=SmartHomeIntegrations Is it possible to set up similar control with this add on? I've used HA for a year or so (mostly for linking devices from different brands), but never ventured too much into custom automations. I've installed the add on, and it appears entities are being read correctly, but I'm struggling with how to write settings to the inverter. If I can't, then I guess i'll buy the SmartDeyeDonglev4 and replace the exisitng Sunsynk dongle, although it seems a shame when control can be done through the Sunsynk and there's a 2 week delivery on the new dongle!
September 6, 20241 yr Hello, I have recently had my solar and inverter installed and am looking into how best to control the system with HA. Just moved to octopus flux, so would be interested in controlling charge/disharge rates and times - similar as can be done with the 'SmartDeyeDongle v4' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IktkBl3inTA&ab_channel=SmartHomeIntegrations Is it possible to set up similar control with this add on? I've used HA for a year or so (mostly for linking devices from different brands), but never ventured too much into custom automations. I've installed the add on, and it appears entities are being read correctly, but I'nm struggling with how to write settings to the inverter. If I can't, then I guess i'll buy the SmartDeyeDonglev4 and replace the exisitng Sunsynk dongle, although it seems a shame when control can be done through the Sunsynk and there's a 2 week delivery on the new dongle!
September 16, 20241 yr Author On 2024/09/06 at 3:00 AM, SunsynkDongler2 said: Hello, I have recently had my solar and inverter installed and am looking into how best to control the system with HA. Just moved to octopus flux, so would be interested in controlling charge/disharge rates and times - similar as can be done with the 'SmartDeyeDongle v4' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IktkBl3inTA&ab_channel=SmartHomeIntegrations Is it possible to set up similar control with this add on? I've used HA for a year or so (mostly for linking devices from different brands), but never ventured too much into custom automations. I've installed the add on, and it appears entities are being read correctly, but I'nm struggling with how to write settings to the inverter. If I can't, then I guess i'll buy the SmartDeyeDonglev4 and replace the exisitng Sunsynk dongle, although it seems a shame when control can be done through the Sunsynk and there's a 2 week delivery on the new dongle! Hi its possible to change settings using this addon, i just havent had the time to create documentation for it. Will try my best to create an example for you tomorrow evening.
October 6, 20241 yr On 2024/09/16 at 6:58 PM, MartinViljoen said: Hi its possible to change settings using this addon, i just havent had the time to create documentation for it. Will try my best to create an example for you tomorrow evening. Hi Martin, I am very interested in this too. I have tried to change one thing as a test and it didn’t work. I tried to change the grid 5 charge to true using {“prog5_charge”: “true”} I’m so close but need a little extra tuition
October 15, 20241 yr @MartinViljoen, Firstly, great add-on. Works wonders, but.... As an Add-on it works and I managed to sort out my father-in-law's queries, but this does require an always-on server set up and if you are like me and not running RaspberryPI it is a hassle. I use a qNAP home server that runs the Home Assist, this is quite a nice setup and has an online time of nearly 100% at this stage. The problem here is that it only runs HA core, this does not allow for Add-ons... (Unless someone can help me here on how to do it, then easy!) The question here is, is it possible to change the Add-on configuration to an integration? This would allow some like myself to do an "integration" as opposed to going the add-on route? This would allow users of HACS to also use this...
October 15, 20241 yr Author 8 hours ago, Rautenk said: @MartinViljoen, Firstly, great add-on. Works wonders, but.... As an Add-on it works and I managed to sort out my father-in-law's queries, but this does require an always-on server set up and if you are like me and not running RaspberryPI it is a hassle. I use a qNAP home server that runs the Home Assist, this is quite a nice setup and has an online time of nearly 100% at this stage. The problem here is that it only runs HA core, this does not allow for Add-ons... (Unless someone can help me here on how to do it, then easy!) The question here is, is it possible to change the Add-on configuration to an integration? This would allow some like myself to do an "integration" as opposed to going the add-on route? This would allow users of HACS to also use this... Thank you for the feedback. I must mention that I'm not as familiar with Home Assistant as most people so I don't know the lingo yet 🙂 I.E when you say "is it possible to change the Add-on configuration to an integration?" In terms of Home assistant what is the difference ? Are integrations "installable" from an external source ? From a user perspective, would it be inconvenient to run an ESP32 plugged into a USB port on your qNAP? Not specifically a qNAP any usb port to provide power to an eSP32 will do even a cellphone charger will work. Example: Here I have an ESP32 which basically replicates what the addon does but externally. It simply grabs the data from the sunsynk cloud via Wifi and then pushes it to HA via HA's Entity API (HTTP) I'm sure the core version of HA allows you to populate entities via API Its running right now as we speak. + Edited October 15, 20241 yr by MartinViljoen
October 15, 20241 yr Author On 2024/10/06 at 10:59 AM, Iain s said: Hi Martin, I am very interested in this too. I have tried to change one thing as a test and it didn’t work. I tried to change the grid 5 charge to true using {“prog5_charge”: “true”} I’m so close but need a little extra tuition I havent forgotten about this. There is a small issue. The Sunsynk api does not like it if you try updating a single setting. It seems it wants you to update a batch of settings. Also the Automation and scenes screen is limited to a certain amount of characters not allowing you to post the entire set of settings due to the character limitation in HA. Not sure how to get around this yet. Hence I started working on an external "Add-on less" solution that runs on an ESP32 as mentioned in the post before this one.
October 22, 20241 yr Hi Martin I have 2 inverters, and followed your guide. The log file said I need to create a helper for both, which I did. Now it says the helpers have no values. I have replaced my inverter SN with the 3 x's for this post Entity does not exist! Manually create it for this inverter using the HA GUI in menu [Settings] -> [Devices & Services] -> [Helpers] tab -> [+ CREATE HELPER]. Choose [Text] and name it [solarsynk_xxx_inverter_settings] Settings pushback system aborted. Note this is not an error, setting up inverter settings push back is optional. It just means you omitted this part of the setup. Helper entity input_text.solarsynk_xxx_inverter_settings has no value. Therefore no inverter setting will be sent for change. Updating Helper: input_text.solarsynk_xxx_inverter_settings with: unknown { "code": 500, "msg": "Internal Server Error", "data": null, "success": false } Regards Edited October 22, 20241 yr by DoubleP adding extra information
October 22, 20241 yr Author Hi , The reason for creating the helper is so that you have a place to store and tell the addon which settings you want to send to the inverter. If you set the helper to JSON {"batteryCap": "100"} it will update the settings and set the battery capacity to 100 After it reads the value of the helper it will then clear it out so that on the next loop it will not send the setting again. Typically you have some automation which gets triggered based on certain conditions which will then set the value that you want to send to the inverter. Be warned though, HA helper values have a character limit and many settings cannot just be sent on their own it needs to be sent with other settings else it will simply not be applied. In some cases this exceeds the character limit of the helper which then makes it impossible to update some settings. Example of some settings I just sent.
November 12, 20241 yr On 2024/10/31 at 2:46 PM, Paulbloggs said: Is it possible to see essential power and non-essential power? No ideas? Or am I missing something obvious?
November 13, 20241 yr Author My setup unfortunately does not have an essential load, So it don't have a way to include it. I was able to add MPPT3 , MPPT4 , Phase 2 and Phase 3 because someone on the forum was kind enough to share their credentials so that I can extract the data points.
November 13, 20241 yr Author 23 hours ago, GreenFields said: UPS power is the essential load I would have thought. I dont think so. But I just added UPS power now as well. Added the following 2024/11/13 Version "2.1.19" - Added more entities Load UPS PowerL1 Load UPS PowerL2 Load UPS PowerL3 Load UPS Total Power
November 16, 20241 yr I started using this add on yesterday but keep getting this in the logs. I am still able to view the values in homeassistant. I also changed the update interval in the add-on and the gateway to 60s but still only getting new values every 5 to 6 minutes don't know if this has something to do with it. Thank you Data fetched for serial ******. Enable verbose logging to see more information. jq: error: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting FORMAT or QQSTRING_START or '[' (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1: .data. jq: 1 compile error /run.sh: line 160: [: ==: unary operator expected jq: error: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting FORMAT or QQSTRING_START or '[' (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1: .data. jq: 1 compile error /run.sh: line 175: [: ==: unary operator expected
November 16, 20241 yr Author 12 hours ago, Rapt0rx said: I started using this add on yesterday but keep getting this in the logs. I am still able to view the values in homeassistant. I also changed the update interval in the add-on and the gateway to 60s but still only getting new values every 5 to 6 minutes don't know if this has something to do with it. Thank you Data fetched for serial ******. Enable verbose logging to see more information. jq: error: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting FORMAT or QQSTRING_START or '[' (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1: .data. jq: 1 compile error /run.sh: line 160: [: ==: unary operator expected jq: error: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting FORMAT or QQSTRING_START or '[' (Unix shell quoting issues?) at <top-level>, line 1: .data. jq: 1 compile error /run.sh: line 175: [: ==: unary operator expected Thanks, I fixed the error. If you update it will hopefully not show the error anymore. With regards to the update rate. You also have to set the update rate to 60s on the sunsynk portal.
November 17, 20241 yr 7 hours ago, MartinViljoen said: Thanks, I fixed the error. If you update it will hopefully not show the error anymore. With regards to the update rate. You also have to set the update rate to 60s on the sunsynk portal. Thank you. I changed the update time here .sunsynk.net/device/gateway Is there another place it needs to be changed.
November 17, 20241 yr Author 4 hours ago, Rapt0rx said: Thank you. I changed the update time here .sunsynk.net/device/gateway Is there another place it needs to be changed. No thats should be it 😉
November 20, 20241 yr On 2024/11/13 at 5:41 PM, MartinViljoen said: I dont think so. But I just added UPS power now as well. Added the following 2024/11/13 Version "2.1.19" - Added more entities Load UPS PowerL1 Load UPS PowerL2 Load UPS PowerL3 Load UPS Total Power Cool - thank you. I now have essential power (UPS total power) and with a bit of arithmetic non-essential load too.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.