Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Power Forum - Renewable Energy Discussion

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (â‹®) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Inverter Neutral Earth bonding

Featured Replies

19 minutes ago, Sc00bs said:

So, just wondering if there has been a consensus reached as to what is the correct way to establish the Earth/Neutral bond on a SS/DEYE inverter, or are we still in disagreement between hard bond vs a relay? 🙂 

My inverter was installed with a hard bond and wondering if I need to change it. 

Neutral ground is yet to be established 👀 I’ll see myself out 😂

  • Replies 200
  • Views 56.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • As another electrically inclined South African looking to stave off loadshedding and reliance on the incumbent utility, I also find myself trying to make sense of the Earth-Neutral bonding story

  • We have been around the block so many times regarding permanent neutral earth bonding. It is not allowed and is dangerous. A TN-S system shall not be converted to a TN-C system and all installations d

  • The E/N bond is only done at the inverter wires and it can be a relay in a DB. It is essential that this bond is only in place when running from battery. It is thus not a permanent bond. 

Posted Images

9 hours ago, WestCoastUPS said:

I have installed a LuxPower SNA5000 on Friday and found a NEV of 82V.

I am beginning to wonder if there is an earthing problem on site which carries through to the inverter output. The earth wire shouldn't disappear during load shedding?

 

You need to do a loop impedance test on Ze( external to transformer) and then do a loop impedance test on Ze+Zs( total installation). 82v is far above allowed spesifications and needs to be shut down. If found that Ze is above 0.35ohms you need to inform the external supplier as there is a problem on the starpoint of the transformer feeding the property.

Edited by TaliaB

8 hours ago, Sc00bs said:

So, just wondering if there has been a consensus reached as to what is the correct way to establish the Earth/Neutral bond on a SS/DEYE inverter, or are we still in disagreement between hard bond vs a relay? 🙂 

My inverter was installed with a hard bond and wondering if I need to change it. 

All i can say again hard bond earth/neutral is illegal not allowed by Sans regulation so the installation could not have a COC. 

1 hour ago, TaliaB said:

All i can say again hard bond earth/neutral is illegal not allowed by Sans regulation so the installation could not have a COC. 

SANS 10142-1 : 7.12.3.1.3

Also asked BravoScan AIA for info on this, and stated that it MUST be permanently bonded.  

image.thumb.png.38cbf3eb5e010c6990ab7b6d29501a53.png
 

Edit: Leon (from BravoScan) just posted on this again

image.thumb.png.9ed15089f7451844deeb6aed5877fefc.png

 

Edited by spotity
Typo

10 hours ago, Sc00bs said:

So, just wondering if there has been a consensus reached as to what is the correct way to establish the Earth/Neutral bond on a SS/DEYE inverter, or are we still in disagreement between hard bond vs a relay? 🙂 

My inverter was installed with a hard bond and wondering if I need to change it. 

As a non-professional layman, it looks to me like neither the relay/contactor nor the hard bond option is 100% compliant with regulations?  

Based on comments, it looks to me like I should be putting a hard bond in place every time I want to switch my inverter to "Island mode" and then removing it before I reconnect to the grid to be compliant with SANS?

6 minutes ago, Sc00bs said:

lol @spotity , the only thing clear is that neither way is 100% compliant and that there is no agreement as to what the correct way to do this is. 

 

@Sc00bsI agree, its so all over the place in terms of opinions. I contacted BravoScan because they are one of the few independents that can refute a COC in South Africa thus hoping I would get the "correct" way of doing it. 

So if sans (as per comments above) need to have the E/N bond permanent, then what happens when you bypass back to eskom/utility?

Earth/neutral would effectively be bonded when using grid only with the bypass?
Is that not why the need for relay is there, to prevent this scenario?

permanent-bond-or-not-that-is-the-question.thumb.jpg.12dd1553f62d09525bbd6788b60adcc8.jpg

Edited by WannabeSolarSparky

46 minutes ago, abd7 said:

What about the inverters which have a relay internally doing the bond then... All illegal? Voltronics, tesla as well.. 

Yes... according to Facebook 🤣

24 minutes ago, PowerUser said:

Yes... according to Facebook 🤣

And SANS and the AIA 😉 

I think the thing that's important here is the fact that islanding is not "normal" for grid tied inverters... Where as in South Africa we can have the grid disconnect up to 6 times a day due to load shedding. 

Edited by spotity

2 minutes ago, spotity said:

And SANS 😉 

That SANS snippet which you posted is not relevant to what is discussed in this thread. The paragraph refers to installations where the inverter is at a remote location and not by the point of entry. You have taken something completely out of it's context.

So PLEASE show us, according to which SANS standard, inverters which have a relay internally doing the bond are illegal? 🤔

image.thumb.png.81ae5cea3566f857af18b1410d3c1aa2.png

This for the GW5048D-ES, but it's still as clear as mud. How does the Aus distribution grid differ from ours? Do they just not bond the N-E at the substations like is done here?

2 hours ago, WannabeSolarSparky said:

So if sans (as per comments above) need to have the E/N bond permanent, then what happens when you bypass back to eskom/utility?

Earth/neutral would effectively be bonded when using grid only with the bypass?
Is that not why the need for relay is there, to prevent this scenario?

permanent-bond-or-not-that-is-the-question.thumb.jpg.12dd1553f62d09525bbd6788b60adcc8.jpg

This wiring above is incorrect !!!
Have my electrician here now, he is wiring it up correctly then I will update the diagram.

1 hour ago, PowerUser said:

That SANS snippet which you posted is not relevant to what is discussed in this thread. The paragraph refers to installations where the inverter is at a remote location and not by the point of entry. You have taken something completely out of it's context.

So PLEASE show us, according to which SANS standard, inverters which have a relay internally doing the bond are illegal? 🤔

Just as a FYI - this is the information AIA provided when I asked, not my interpretation of anything.

In terms of inverters that bond internally I cannot comment - but I would presume they have a mechanism in place should the bond fail when islanding. In the case of Deye/Sunsynk - they have no way of knowing if the bond took place successfully... The discussion of this thread is permanent vs bonded, not "Inverters that bond internally".

Edited by spotity

Subscribing to this one. My Sunsynk installation also makes use of a permanent neutral bond. I asked my installer about it, and they insisted that it is the correct way of doing it.

Edited by DawieZA

1 hour ago, spotity said:

this is the information AIA provided

They provided you with information not relevant to the SunSynk bonding as well. That snippet refers to installations where the inverter is at a remote location and not by the point of entry.

2 hours ago, spotity said:

In terms of inverters that bond internally I cannot comment - but I would presume they have a mechanism in place should the bond fail when islanding.

@Coulomb without dragging you into this whole discussion, can you please just confirm for us, if the Voltronic inverters have a mechanism in place should the internal relay bond fails while islanding?

'Om te meet is om te weet'  

If you measure potential between the N and E bars on both non-essentials and essentials whilst the grid is on, it confirms bonding (150mV)  As soon as grid falls away and islanding takes place, potential voltage between N bar(Essentials) and E, climbs from mV to 70-80V, thus indicating 'no bonding'.  . 

Deye installation manual indicates AC signal to external relay to achieve bonding in islanding mode.

I presume that, based on the measurements, that permanent bonding on essential side, at the inverter, would serve the same function as an intermittent bonding when in islanding mode.

Thus, permanent bonding, or using AC signal for relayed bonding in islanding mode, depends on the interpretation of the regulation.  Both will achieve the same purpose.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.